Article

OpenOffice 2.0: Exclusive Interview – OpenOffice Leaders McCreesh and Suarez-Potts

Addresses Look-and-Feel, MS Office, and Other Issues

Enterprise Open Source Magazine was able to catch up in cyberspace with OpenOffice.org Marketing Project leader John McCreesh and community manager Louis Suarez-Potts, who graciously answered our questions about OpenOffice 2.0.

Here is what they had to say:

Enterprise Open Source Magazine: Version 2.0 has been in development for two years, I believe. How many people and companies took part in the revision, and what are the major improvements?

John McCreesh: The OpenOffice.org community numbers thousands of members, who have contributed in a variety of ways to the new version - reporting bugs, requesting enhancements, developing, testing, translating, documenting,
providing user support, artwork, marketing... The community also benefits from support from a number of commercial organizations, including Novell, RedHat, Intel, and most notably our founder Sun Microsystems.

Independent reviewers have emphasised the improved "look and feel" of OpenOffice.org 2. This is a tribute to the way our developers have responded to feedback from thousands of users and also from studies in usability labs. The addition of a fully-integrated database component has also been high on our users' wish list.

Behind the scenes, the biggest change is that OpenOffice.org 2 uses the OpenDocument file formats by default. This means user's data is stored in a vendor-independent, OASIS approved format, so they will be guaranteed access to their data from any compliant software package, and will never be locked out of their files if they decide to change their software in future.

EOS: The OpenOffice 2.0 press release says it is "fluidly interoperable with every major office suite." Does this mean users will have no problems reading Microsoft Office documents? Will MS Office users have no trouble reading OO documents?

More Stories By Open Source News

Enterprise Open Source News Desk trawls the fast-growing world of Professional Open Source for business-relevant items of news, opinion, and insight.

Comments (3) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Chris Aubrey-Smith 10/28/05 03:16:47 AM EDT

Great stuff! I've just installed 2.0, having used nothing but OpenOffice/StarOffice for years. I use a mix of W*nd*ws and Linux machines, moving files between them effortlessly - a benefit which I feel has not been emphasised enough!

C. Beta 10/27/05 04:54:32 PM EDT

Despite all the glorious press claims, OO is still ancient bloatware in a modern "open software" wrapper.

Also, OO has never had a useable Mac version, which is odd considering that OS X is the most popular Unix in the world (and rapidly growing, unlike Linux which has stalled on the desktop).

And OO's new Base database is almost completely useless - I challenge you to do actual work with it.

Enterprise Open Source Magazine News Desk 10/21/05 01:39:14 PM EDT

OpenOffice Leader John McCreesh Discusses Version 2.0. OpenOffice.org Marketing Project Co-Lead John McCreesh, in an exclusive interview with Enterprise Open Source Magazine, discusses how 'thousands of members' became involved in the OpenOffice 2.0 revision, how the product meets the challenge of Microsoft Office, and why it should be a preferred solution for organizations of all sizes.